🔗 Share this article

Based on a new examination, scores of individuals with backgrounds in the fossil fuel sector have been positioned within the present administration, comprising more than 40 who formerly served straight for coal corporations.

Background of the Analysis

This study examined the backgrounds of nominees and appointees positioned in the White House and multiple national departments handling energy matters. These cover important entities like the Environmental Protection Agency, the Interior Department, and the Department of Energy.

Larger Administrative Environment

This report emerges during continuing efforts to dismantle climate regulations and alternative energy incentives. For example, recent legislation have released extensive areas of government land for mining and eliminated backing for sustainable power.

Amid the firehose of terrible developments that have occurred on the climate arena... it’s important to remind the public that these are not just actions from the amorphous, ginormous thing that is the government broadly, stated one researcher involved in the study. They are frequently particular individuals coming from certain wealthy groups that are carrying out this disastrous deregulatory agenda.

Significant Discoveries

Analysts identified 111 staff whom they considered as energy sector veterans and alternative energy adversaries. That covers 43 individuals who were directly serving by oil companies. Among them are prominent leading officials such as the top energy official, who formerly worked as chief executive of a fracking company.

This group additionally includes lesser-known White House personnel. For instance, the office handling energy efficiency is led by a former gas leader. In the same vein, a senior policy consultant in the executive office has held top-level roles at major oil corporations.

Other Connections

Another 12 personnel were found to have links to fossil fuel-funded libertarian policy organizations. Those cover previous employees and researchers of organizations that have actively fought alternative sources and promoted the expansion of fossil fuels.

Moreover 29 further appointees are ex- corporate managers from manufacturing fields whose business interests are intimately connected to energy resources. Other personnel have associations with utility providers that distribute fossil fuels or public officials who have supported pro-gas initiatives.

Agency Concentration

Researchers found that 32 staff at the Department of the Interior alone have links to polluting energy, establishing it as the most affected national agency. That encompasses the secretary of the department, who has repeatedly accepted industry support and served as a bridge between oil and gas industry donors and the administration.

Political Funding

Energy contributors donated substantial money to the campaign initiative and ceremony. Since entering the White House, the government has not only enacted industry-friendly regulations but also crafted benefits and exceptions that favor the field.

Expertise Concerns

Besides oil-tied nominees, the authors found a number of White House officials who were nominated to key positions with minimal or no subject matter experience.

These people may not be linked to fossil fuels so closely, but their unfamiliarity is dangerous, said one co-author. It’s plausible to think they will be pushovers, or easy marks, for the oil industry’s agenda.

As an example, the nominee to lead the environmental agency’s division of chief legal officer has very little legal history, having not once argued a case to verdict, not taken a sworn statement, and not argued a court petition.

In another case, a executive advisor focusing on regulatory issues came to the position after working in jobs unrelated to energy, with no obvious specific field or regulatory background.

Administration Statement

One spokesperson for the White House dismissed the analysis, commenting that the administration’s personnel are highly competent to execute on the people’s instruction to boost domestic fuel development.

Historical and Current Backdrop

This administration enacted a massive series of pro-industry actions during its first tenure. During its current term, equipped with pro-business blueprints, it has spearheaded a much wider and stricter rollback on environmental rules and renewable energy.

There’s no hesitation, said one analyst. They are willing and willing to go out there and tout the fact that they are executing benefits for the fossil fuel business, mining sector, the coal sector.